The folly of Meghan McCain

I recently posted on FaceBook a comment made by Ms. McCain which generated quite a bit of traffic.  Her comments have bothered my for a few days now and I think I finally understand why.  It’s because of several intertwined themes I am seeing in this Republic of ours.

MEGHAN McCAIN: “Well, I speak as a 26 year old woman and my problem is that no matter what, Christine O’Donnell is making a mockery of running for public office. She has no real history, no real success in any kind of business. And what that says to my generation is one day you can just wake up and run for Senate no matter how lack of… experience you have. And it scares me for a lot of reasons.”

The implications are that if one is not a political insider or business mogul we should just as soon not get out of bed as get the harebrained idea that we could be qualified to run for public office, in this case the US Senate.  A quick review of the US Constitution will reveal a very limited list of prerequisites for candidacy to the US Senate.

“No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”

Those requirements are 1) must be 30 years old 2) must have been a citizen for 9 years 3) must live in the state which you are representing.  That’s it.  I don’t see any requirement that a candidate possess a certain level of education, financial prowess, business experience, military experience, political connections, or even a lack of a criminal record.  This is my first problem with her comment.  My second problem is with US, the voters.

When did we become a nation that relied upon others who were smarter/better qualified/more educated/more experienced to direct how we live our lives?  Is Ms. O’Donnell crazy? I don’t know nor do I care.  Is she brilliant?  I don’t know nor do I care.  I know she has had to hold a job in which she would be fired for a lack of performance.  She has had to live on a budget.  She has had to live like an average American.  Gone are the days that our legislators would meet in a limited capacity relying upon their private endeavors to provide an income.  We now have an elitist class of aristocrats who come from the halls of academia with law degrees who know better how we should live our lives having never had to walk a mile in our shoes.  I am not the smartest person in the room, I am not the most financially successful person either.  I am not the most politically active or experienced.  I would place money though that I can discuss the Constitution, the founding legal document of our Republic in greater detail than many of our rulers.  I feel this qualifies me to run for any office that the child of a career politician.

It is said that Jefferson stated he would rather face a jury of farmers than lawyers.  I am inclined to think he would also rather a legislation filled with people who know real work (physical and intellectual) who have had to live lives impacted by decisions made by legislators rather than lawyers who spend their entire lives in a city on a swamp elevated above the laws of the masses.

About Andrew Dymond

I'm a 30-something father and husband. I am a believer in free-market capitalism, though wouldn't know where to find that these days. If I have to classify myself I would say I am a pseudo-objectivist, deist, classical liberal/little r republican/libertarian with conservative leanings, anarcho-capitalist.
Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The folly of Meghan McCain

  1. Stuart_Clancy says:

    Mr. Dymond, I appreciate your strong opinion, but feel that it might be biased since you must work in politics or write for a local paper. Where can I read more of your work?

    In my opinion, O’Donnell has no chance winning since she is in one of the most liberal states in the country. Heck, they elected a Democratic grandmother a couple of years ago…what makes you think that they will elect her?


    • Andrew Dymond says:

      Hi Stu,

      Actually I am a recruiter by trade and a Marketing guy by education. I’m also entirely new to the writing thing. I’ve never blogged before or even written for local papers. I’m just passionate about individual liberty and resisting the encroachment of those liberties by out of control government (party indifferent). I appreciate the implied compliment though.

      I’m not of the opinion that she will win, but I am hopeful that she can at least draw enough support to alter the course of future elections. The political insiders need to be removed and those of us who are political outsiders need to become more involved IMO. I think Ms. O’Donnell is showing the establishment that. Though looking at political polls, trends analysis, and general voter dissatisfaction evidenced by approval numbers I am not convinced the Democratic base in DE is sufficiently energized to come out to support Coons. I think the race will be closer than many expect, but am not suggesting O’Donnell will come out on top.


    • David says:

      Very nice contribution Andrew, Keep it up.

  2. Brent Haladyna says:

    Great work Andrew! Keep writing… -b

  3. Dan Gillings says:

    ‘Folly’ is a nice term for saying this;

    “And what that says to my generation is one day you can just wake up and run for Senate no matter how lack of… experience you have. And it scares me for a lot of reasons.”

    Uber-elitist, ivory tower living, ‘never worked a day in her life’, arrogant POS is a better description.

    Or maybe she’s just dumb. Either way, anything that falls out of her mouth smells like the back end of a cow.

  4. Andrew Shemo says:

    this doesn’t surprise me..after all, she is the daughter of that neoconservative John McCain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>